When designing optical networks, engineers face a critical choice: FBT or PLC splitters? Each technology has distinct advantages. FBT splitters, manufactured using fused biconical taper machines, excel in cost efficiency for split ratios up to 1:32. Their simple construction—using heated and stretched fibers—makes them ideal for PON (Passive Optical Network) deployments in residential areas.
PLC splitters, by contrast, leverage semiconductor fabrication techniques to etch waveguides into silica substrates. They offer superior uniformity and stability, supporting up to 1:64 splits with minimal loss variation. This makes them preferable for enterprise networks and harsh environments, where temperature fluctuations (-40°C to 85°C) demand robust performance.
Recent studies highlight regional preferences. In Europe, where aging grid infrastructure requires modular upgrades, FBT splitters dominate due to their plug-and-play compatibility. In Asia’s hyperscale data centers, PLCs are preferred for their density and scalability.
For network architects, the decision hinges on application-specific needs: FBT for affordability and simplicity, PLC for precision and scalability.
More info about Fiber FBT Machine, please visit our official website:www.fiber-mart.com
English Home
简体中文
Online Message
Skype
QQ:20181072
